Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Honest Writes

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Determine President Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Role in the Global Order

Following launching a night of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a notable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had effectively captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" entails is uncertain, but the pledge represents an sudden change of course for the president, full of contradictions and significant obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now staking his administration on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to recruit American energy companies to rebuild Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, supplying capital for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has reshaped Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to previous operations, which have largely involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are notably different.

His aim, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan could be difficult for some of Trump's supporters to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of abandoning his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual military aggression and backing for foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be questioned again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, territory and resources that are core to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke broader concerns in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless assault on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with legislative leaders before launching the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to abide by the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with no American casualties and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most stunning, successful and impressive displays of American power and competency in US history."

Now he is gambling his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US says it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unclear. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a region that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

About the author

Sarah Martin

A passionate storyteller and cultural critic, Elara explores human experiences through personal essays and reflective narratives.

Honest Writes

Type to search articles.